Top World News

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

MAGA leader warns 'Texas will be flipping its Senate seat blue' if one trend persists

Former MAGA lawmaker Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) had a harsh message Wednesday for President Donald Trump as results from the Texas primary showed a serious problem for the Republican Party ahead of the midterms. Greene, the former Trump ally who has now become a vocal critic of the administration, described why the voter turnout in Texas could signal challenges for Republican candidates not just in the Lone Star state — but across the United States — as the Trump administration ramps up its military attacks against Iran. "Now that Trump and his admin betrayed their campaign promises of No More Foreign Wars/No More Regime Change and Republicans in the majority in the House and Senate are flat out refusing to pass key legislation, voter outrage was shown in yesterday’s Texas primary," Greene posted on X early Wednesday.Greene pointed out that "more Democrats showed up to vote than Republicans in yesterday’s Texas primary" and that if that happens in November, Texas could flip its Senate seat blue. The last time a Democrat won a statewide election was in 1994, she added. Greene left office in January and has suggested that the MAGA coalition has fractured over its "America First" ideology."Whatever Trump’s new twisted perversion of MAGA is, is going to LOSE in the midterms," Greene wrote. "Clearly Levin, Lindsey Graham, Loomer, and Netanyahu highjacking MAGA and flipping it to MIGA is not working out so well. People do not want to vote for this s--- show and didn’t turn out in Texas. Maybe they will wake up now and realize Armageddon is not what we voted for. We voted for America FIRST and that means AMERICANS FIRST AND AMERICANS ONLY."Now that Trump and his admin betrayed their campaign promises of No More Foreign Wars/No More Regime Change and Republicans in the majority in the House and Senate are flat out refusing to pass key legislation, voter outrage was shown in yesterday’s Texas primary.More Democrats…— Marjorie Taylor Greene ???????? (@mtgreenee) March 4, 2026

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

There's one word MAGA senators won't use about Trump's Iran attack: 'We're in a bombing'

WASHINGTON — A debate’s raging within the Republican Party over whether or not America’s at war with Iran."We're in a bombing," Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) told Raw Story. "We're bombing the hell out of them."Despite the 2,000 targets reportedly hit, 17 naval ships allegedly destroyed and ongoing “24/7 strikes into Iran” — according to Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Central Command — some of the more MAGA members of the Senate GOP refuse to use the “w” word. “No. This regime was the one that was at war with us,” Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-OK) told Raw Story. The Constitution and the War Powers Act of 1973 say Congress, not the president, has the power to declare war. On Wednesday, Senate Democrats were due to force a vote on a war powers resolution. Many Republicans say that’s unnecessary. “This is not a war, this is a conflict now,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) told Raw Story. “War is when you put people on the ground going in there and fight for months and months. This is not going to last that long.”“You think it'll be easy?” Raw Story asked.“It's not gonna be easy,” Tuberville said. “It's just gonna be.”“Some people in MAGA are saying, ‘This ain't what we signed up for,’” Raw Story pushed. “That's a different type of MAGA than I deal with,” Tuberville said. “That's exactly what I signed up for, making our country first again, protecting our citizens, doing everything they possibly can to make us the number one country in the world again, militarily and financially.” ‘Undeclared state of war’Debate over the “w” word would be news to President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who have both referred to the ongoing campaign as a “war.” The same could be said of the neocon wing of the GOP, which has been calling for war with Iran for decades. “We’re in an undeclared state of war,” one such Republican, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), told Raw Story. “Six dead soldiers, you're at war. So we're in an undeclared state of war that's been going on since 1979.”Others in the GOP shrug off the semantic debate. “Who cares what you call it?” Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) told Raw Story. “Bombs are dropping, bad people are dying. Unfortunately, some good people are dying too.”To Democrats, there’s no debate, which is why in the Senate the party is forcing its eighth vote on war powers resolutions on Wednesday afternoon. “I take the president at his own words. He calls it a war," Senate Intelligence Committee Vice-chair Mark Warner (D-VA) told Raw Story. “They're all over the map. Don't take my word for it, look at the four different answers that have come from the President and the senior leadership.” ‘No exit plan’While the administration says it’s at war, Democrats aren’t convinced it’s prepared. “There was no planning. The best you can say is haphazard,” Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-CO) told Raw Story. “There's no exit plan. There's no strategy. The risks are so enormous.” “A lot of your [Republican] colleagues are telling me, ‘No, there's no fear of mission creep,’” Raw Story said. “I'm like, ‘Have you guys read any history?’” “I mean, it's, I don't know. I regret, I mean …” Hickenlooper said, then stopped himself. “I'm not often very speechless,” he said. After a moment to gather his thoughts, the former Colorado governor found words. “I guess I'd say that it's something you're going to have to be very, very careful as we disengage,” Hickenlooper told Raw Story. “I don't think anybody wants a real war at scale, but they didn't want that in World War I either.”

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

Ex-senator warns Trump faces 'biggest problem' yet in Iran: 'They can't fix this now'

Former Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO) shredded President Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on MS NOW's "Morning Joe" Wednesday, for rushing headlong into a war in Iran without any idea why they are doing it or what they are going to do now that it's happening."You said on Armed Services, these are issues you've thought a lot about," said anchor Jonathan Lemire. "Give us your take now about these mixed messages from the administration as to why this war even began. But more than that, it seems so very clear there's not a plan for the day after, including President Trump yesterday, in a moment, perhaps, of unexpected candor, said it sort of dawned on him like, oh, he was asked who could follow the Ayatollah as Supreme Leader? And he's like, oh, well, I guess the worst case would be someone who's just as bad. It's very clear there's no plan for the next day.""Yeah, I mean, we have a very muddled why and when, and I don't care what the administration does now," said McCaskill. "They have been incompetent in one of the most important things a government must do when going to war, and that is having clear rationale for an attack, clear rationale for lives lost, clear rationale for why it happened when it happened. And they can't fix this now. This is muddled beyond recognition.""But more importantly, there's the 'what now' question," McCaskill continued. "And in the 12 years I sat on the Armed Services Committee, I spent a lot of time on contracting in Iraq and Afghanistan. And I can tell you that the 'what now' is the biggest problem of all. We have no idea whether someone even more extreme is going to take over Iran. And if they do, what now? We have no idea whether the government will have any even wisp of democracy involved. And if it doesn't, then what now? We have no idea if the plans will be to immediately reconstitute whatever they need to do to get nuclear power. And then what now? So the lack of planning here, in terms of the day after is stunning."McCaskill concluded by taking a swipe at what she sees as Hegseth's infantile view of military force."I never thought I would hear the Secretary of Defense talk like my 12-year-old grandson saying that our enemy is quote-unquote, 'toast,'" said McCaskill. "The way he discussed this was not serious. It was not somber. It was almost gleeful. And frankly, I think that is startling to most Americans. I found it startling, the tone that he took in this press conference. I get it that he thinks this is all about killing people and showing lethality and supporting the warriors. And certainly we must support our warriors. But the tone of it was, in my mind, inappropriate for this moment in history." - YouTube www.youtube.com

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

Puerto Rico police say armed suspect opens ambulance door and kills injured man

Police in Puerto Rico say an armed suspect flung open the door of an ambulance and fatally shot a man who was being treated by medics for bullet wounds he received during a shooting earlier in the U.S. territory’s capital

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

Claims of 'rediscovered' Michelangelos unsettle Renaissance experts

An independent researcher has asserted that a marble bust of Christ in a Roman church is by Michelangelo

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

Unlikely Trump ally convinced president to strike Iran to preserve legacy: 'He's all in'

Donald Trump's order to strike Iran had been pitched to him as a way to salvage his legacy by an unlikely ally. The president's administration carried out strikes on the Middle Eastern country earlier this week, confirming the death of ayatollah Ali Khamenei in the process. Six US military personnel have also been killed in counterstrikes carried out by Iran. The bombing campaign on Iran came to be when Lindsey Graham took Trump to task on what he wanted to be his legacy. Graham, who had previously condemned Trump as a "race-baiting, xenophobic, religious bigot" has since become a close ally of the president during Trump's second term. Speaking with Politico, Graham said, "We were thinking about this early, early on about how Iran is a spoiler for expanding the Abraham Accords and stability in the Mideast. I told him before he took office… if you can collapse this terrorist regime, that’s Berlin Wall stuff."Graham also claims he managed to cut through the naysayers on bombing Iran and convinced the president it was the right course of action to back Israel in their campaign. He said, "There was a real fight not to do it. Let Israel do it by itself, or just not do much. So we talked a lot about this: ‘Mr. President, you want to have your fingerprints on this. You want them to know America will fight.' He’s a hard sell, but when you sell him, he’s all in."Graham went on to suggest a regime change would ultimately benefit the US, and that if the new Iranian government takes the same stance as ayatollah Khamenei, the military may intervene again. "If they want to reconstitute their country, to build more nuclear weapons and more missiles to hit us, we’ll treat the new people like we did the old people," he said. "I just don’t believe it. I think they’re going to find a way to ... be a different country."'You break it. You own it.' That may be true for a consignment shop, but it's not true for foreign policy. If there's a threat, break it."

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

529 million reasons Trump and his bloodthirsty Camelot of buffoons dragged us into war

Do you ever get the feeling we’re being played like an out-of-tune violin, every minute of each day?Take this war in Iran and its first week of airstrikes. Our clueless president and his even more bloodthirsty and incompetent Secretary of “War” are offended that people keep asking what the conflict is about and why we launched it when they don’t seem to have the first clue themselves.First, it was about stopping Iran from developing nuclear warheads and ballistic missiles capable of reaching the U.S. Then it surrounded a need for “regime change,” that ridiculously benign euphemism used instead of “violent government overthrow,” which sounds so much messier. Then it was just basically, “They’re an evil, repressive country that’s the greatest state sponsor of terrorism.” Finally, it became, “We’re looking to bring liberation to Iranian citizens.”As if.The ever-changing series of justifications leaves me wondering what’s next. Maybe, “Israel was upset that Iran is positioned just in front of it alphabetically and sought help in bombing Iran until it agreed to change its name back to Persia.”It’s clear these morons had no plan, other than, “Blow up a lot of stuff because explosions are cool!” It’s as if Beavis and Butthead are running U.S. intelligence. There is no plan for the Iranian people. Basically, the marching orders are to bombard and eventually depart, leaving mass destruction and abandonment behind.Atta’ way to build global goodwill, America!Of course, attempting to distract from the Epstein files has to be near the top of any list of actual unstated rationalizations for this disaster, which is why I’ve dubbed the campaign, supposedly Operation Epic Fury, “Operation Epstein Suppression.” What’s really going on remains anyone’s guess. Whatever pops into Trump’s head becomes the defining rationale until the following minute/hour/day, when it becomes something else.This is what happens when you elect a sociopathic toddler with ADHD.Iran has supposedly been two weeks away from having enough enriched uranium to construct a nuke for the better part of four decades. It’s always what we hear.But back to Trump, our delusional and witless leader, now permitted to make unilateral decisions like which country to invade without much blowback from the increasingly compliant media, much less any explanation to the American people.So we’re clear: the Iran bombing occurred under the cover of darkness, on a weekend early morning, in flagrant violation of the U.S. Constitution.But wait! As I write, yet another justification slips through: the claim that Iran planned to preemptively strike American forces and therefore forced our hand. Gimme another 15 minutes — that will likely be refuted.Let’s put it on the record that if Trump really wanted to destroy Iran, he’d declare himself its president and take over for a couple of months. Much more effective than bombs.We must also remember that Trump was, per his 2024 campaign, the “Start No Wars President.” Then when that evaporated, he was the “No Extended Wars President.” Then early this week came the inevitable New York Times headline: “Trump Foresees Extended War on Iran as U.S. Adds to Forces.”So much for that.Uncertainty. Lies. Chaos. Corruption. The hallmarks of this administration in peacetime, now one in a war that will likely drag on long enough to both divert attention from Epstein (at least for a while) and toss the midterms into turmoil. Like everyone has predicted all along.(And wait, oh yes, it’s now been another 10 minutes, and it seems there was no confirmation of the Pentagon having feared a preemptive strike. Never mind.)And yet, there is more. It also emerged on Tuesday that one noncommissioned officer maintained he was directed to tell his troops Trump was “anointed by Jesus” and that war with Iran should be as “bloody” as possible to bring about Biblical end times — that the war was “all part of God’s divine plan” to bring about Armageddon. This is what you get when your Pentagon chief is a rabid evangelical Christian/religious zealot/raging alcoholic. As if we didn’t already have enough to worry about without casting this as some holy war to justify merciless carnage.On Sunday, the Save America Movement pointed out the following: “There has never been a military action in which the men leading it (overseen by Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu) have had less moral stature and integrity than this lot.“Together, they are the unfittest of the unfit. A Camelot of buffoons, warmongers, and liars. They are a team of losers and felons, pedophile protecters, fascists, weirdos, religious nutters, and weapons-grade hypocrites who are playing a deadly game with young Americans’ lives.”Add to this the fear that Iran is now highly motivated to lash out on our turf, leaving us concerned about terror attacks on land, sea, or air. On that score, the worst news is that a massive swath of our domestic security personnel is now more concerned with busting day laborers in Home Depot parking lots than defending the homeland. Priorities, people.I’d like to close with yet another possible incentive for when and why this war with Iran was launched: money.It surfaced on Monday that the gambling website Polymarket found $529 million traded on bets predicting the day when the U.S. and Israel would attack Iran. It turned out Feb. 28 was correct. Six newly created accounts made more than $1 million on that prediction. Note: Donald Trump Jr. sits on the Polymarket advisory board.Additionally, it’s instructive to note that the countries clamoring for government overthrow in Iran are the same ones that have enriched members of the extended Trump family, via direct gifts and shady deals.When the man running the country openly operates a criminal enterprise out of the White House, it’s hardly out of the realm of possibility that he might launch a war to enrich himself and those around him. In fact, it would be completely on brand.Ray Richmond is a longtime journalist/author and an adjunct professor at Chapman University in Orange, CA.

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

Cuba files terrorism charges against suspects over fatal US boat shooting

Cuba said it has filed terrorism charges against six suspects it says were aboard a Florida-flagged speedboat that allegedly opened fire on soldiers in waters off the island’s north coast

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

London police arrest 3 men on suspicion of spying for China

London police say they have arrested three men suspected of spying for China in violation of the U.K.’s National Security Act

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

Carney says he backs strikes on Iran 'with some regret' as world order frays

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney says he supports the strikes on Iran “with some regret” as they represent an extreme example of a rupturing world order

ArticleImg

Mar 4, 2026

Cuba charges six exiles with terrorism in wake of deadly speedboat attack

Detainees accused of coming from the US with intent to sow chaos and attack military units on Communist-ruled islandCuban prosecutors have formally charged six people with crimes of terrorism after a US-flagged speedboat was involved in a deadly shootout with Cuba’s coast guard last week.The US-based Cuban defendants are accused of packing a boat with weapons and heading toward Cuba in hopes of destabilising the government in Havana. Continue reading...